Microsoft Outlook / Hotmail / Live / MSN / Exchange Online error guide

Microsoft Outlook / Hotmail / Live / MSN / Exchange Online SMTP 550 5.7.705: Tenant Suspicious Traffic Threshold

Microsoft Outlook / Hotmail / Live / MSN / Exchange Online SMTP 550 5.7.705 usually means sender policy. Learn whether to retry, suppress the recipient, or fix sender setup.

Quick summary

Primary code
550 5.7.705
Provider coverage
Microsoft Outlook / Hotmail / Live / MSN / Exchange Online
Primary action
Fix sender setup

How to handle 550 5.7.705

Match the provider, SMTP stage, endpoint, and diagnostic wording first, then use the checks below to decide whether to retry, suppress the recipient, or fix sender setup.

Microsoft mail servers 550 5.7.705

Sender policy

Fix sender setup

Sender policy means the receiving provider rejected the message for a provider-specific reason. Use the diagnostic text before deciding on retries or suppression.

Decision

Do not retry unchanged. Fix the sender setup first.

Confidence: high. Recipient validity: unknown.

Match this reply

SMTP stage
End of DATA
Endpoint
SMTP submission
tenant has exceeded thresholdthreshold

Start here

  1. 1

    Review provider-side sender restrictions, recent traffic spikes, and tenant policy limits.

  2. 2

    Reduce volume and fix any sender policy issues before retrying.

Confirm the cause

  1. Review recent sending volume, bounce rate, complaint rate, and list hygiene for this provider.
  2. Confirm SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment so reputation problems are not made worse by authentication failures.
  3. Resume with lower provider-specific volume only after deferrals stop or the provider accepts test mail.

App handling

  • Treat this as a sender setup incident, not a bad recipient.
  • Hold similar mail for the same sender domain or provider until the fix is verified.
  • Retry after a fresh single-recipient test succeeds.

Avoid

  • Do not retry unchanged in a loop.
  • Do not suppress the recipient unless the text explicitly says the mailbox is invalid.
  • Do not treat a permanent SMTP code as proof that the address is bad; policy and routing failures can also be permanent.
Common causes
  • Volume increased faster than the provider trusts for this sender.
  • Recent bounces, complaints, or low engagement damaged sender reputation.
  • The provider applied a traffic, content, or sender policy to protect recipients.
Developer details
Fields to log
raw SMTP replyremote MX or hostSMTP stagereply codeenhanced codeprovidermatched rule idrecipientsending domaindecisiontimestamp
Classifier evidence
Specific cause
tenant suspicious traffic threshold
Evidence
official

Not sure this is the right match?

Paste the full SMTP reply into the lookup tool. The classifier uses provider, endpoint, SMTP stage, reply code, enhanced code, token, and diagnostic text.

Open lookup tool